On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 19:32 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 5 March 2007 15:44, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 15:25 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[
On Monday, 5 March 2007 15:44, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 15:25 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm.
> > > >
> > > > Now i
On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 15:25 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm.
> >
> > Now i get this BUG:
> >
>
> Does it die the same way if you just unload the button
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 15:25 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm.
> >
> > Now i get this BUG:
> >
>
> Does it die the same way if you just unload the button driver without
> suspending?
>
No. Tried unloading and loading 30
On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm.
Now i get this BUG:
Does it die the same way if you just unload the button driver without
suspending?
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAI
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 00:36 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 February 2007 07:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > This gives:
> > >
> > > (gdb) l *evdev_disconnect+0xb1
> > > 0xa81 is in evdev_disconnect (include/asm/processor.h:716).
> > > 711However we don't do prefetc
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 10:01 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 00:36 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >
> > > Please try the patch below.
> >
> > Hmmm. Is the diff against 2.6.20? All hunks except one fails wh
On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 00:36 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> Please try the patch below.
Hmmm. Is the diff against 2.6.20? All hunks except one fails when i try
it. If I pass "-F 3" to patch, then one more hunk succeeds. Am I doi
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 00:36 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 February 2007 07:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > This gives:
> > >
> > > (gdb) l *evdev_disconnect+0xb1
> > > 0xa81 is in evdev_disconnect (include/asm/processor.h:716).
> > > 711However we don't do prefetc
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 07:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > This gives:
> >
> > (gdb) l *evdev_disconnect+0xb1
> > 0xa81 is in evdev_disconnect (include/asm/processor.h:716).
> > 711However we don't do prefetches for pre XP Athlons currently
> > 712That should be fixed. */
On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 01:27, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:30 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 01:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 00:12, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:23, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-02
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:30 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > PROBLEM: "BUG:" when resumimg from suspend-to-ram
> > >
> > >
On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 00:12, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:23, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:04 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
>
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:23, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:04 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > > >
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:23, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:04 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > PROBLEM: "BUG:" when resumimg from suspend-to-ram
> >
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > PROBLEM: "BUG:" when resumimg from suspend-to-ram
> >
> > My laptop have a problem with resuming from suspend-to-ram.
> > It does no
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:04 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > PROBLEM: "BUG:" when resumimg from suspend-to-ram
> >
> > My laptop have a problem with resuming from suspend-to-ram.
> > It does not
Hi,
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> PROBLEM: "BUG:" when resumimg from suspend-to-ram
>
> My laptop have a problem with resuming from suspend-to-ram.
> It does not occur every time - most of the time, resume works without
> any problem.at
19 matches
Mail list logo
