(2013/02/21 17:34), Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
On 02/21/2013 03:22 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
>>
>> Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
>> Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
>>
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
>
> Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
> Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
> kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
>
> Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
> Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
> kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to memcg?
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to memcg?
On 02/21/2013 03:22 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
(2013/02/21 17:34), Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
8 matches
Mail list logo
