On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 03:18:21AM +, Ton Hospel wrote:
> I was talking about avoiding that the same device gets multiple mounted
> at the SAME place, e.g. when doing mount -a, which is often used as a
> quick way to get the new entries in /etc/fstab
You get EBUSY if you try.
-
To unsubscri
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Ton Hospel wrote:
>
>> It should still need a special flag or something, since it's
>> impossible for userspace to check this atomically.
>
> To check _what_? Having the same tree mounted in
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Ton Hospel wrote:
> It should still need a special flag or something, since it's
> impossible for userspace to check this atomically.
To check _what_? Having the same tree mounted in several places is
allowed. End of story. Atomicity of any kind is a non-issue - if you
hav
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> 1. multiple mount of devices possible 2.4.0-test1 - 2.4.0-test13-pre4
>>
>> 2. its still possible to mount devices several times.
>>IMHO it shouldnt be poss
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 1. multiple mount of devices possible 2.4.0-test1 - 2.4.0-test13-pre4
>
> 2. its still possible to mount devices several times.
>IMHO it shouldnt be possible like 2.2.18
No.
The multi-mount thing is a _major_ feature, and the fact that you
1. multiple mount of devices possible 2.4.0-test1 - 2.4.0-test13-pre4
2. its still possible to mount devices several times.
IMHO it shouldnt be possible like 2.2.18
with umount in /proc/mounts is still the real information,
in /etc/mtab all corresponding mountpoints are deleted.
3. ker
6 matches
Mail list logo
