Reinecke wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>>>>>>> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>>>>>>> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
On 2013年10月21日 14:07, vaughan wrote:
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Hi Hannes,
On 10/21/2013 08:07 AM, vaughan wrote:
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Hi Hannes,
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
> different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
> functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Hi Hannes,
We only tested the later patch whic
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
> different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
> functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Of course. This one is more clear to express ou
gt; On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>>>>>> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>>>>>> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
&
On 2013年10月15日 13:51, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
But that notwithstanding, did you get a chance to test my patch?
Cheers,
Hannes
Hi Hannes,
Kernel patched and waiting feedback from lab guy.
Thanks,
Vaughan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On 10/15/2013 05:32 AM, vaughan wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 07:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> In the log, inquiry to LUN7 return a sense - asc,ascq=04h,0Ch
>> (Logical unit not accessible, target port in unavailable state).
>> And this is ignored, so scsi_probe_lun() returns -EIO and the scan
>> proce
On 10/14/2013 07:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> In the log, inquiry to LUN7 return a sense - asc,ascq=04h,0Ch
> (Logical unit not accessible, target port in unavailable state).
> And this is ignored, so scsi_probe_lun() returns -EIO and the scan
> process is aborted.
>
> I have two questions:
> 1.
,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
For instance, storage represents 8 iscsi LUNs, however the LUN No.7
is not well configured or has something wrong.
Then messages received:
kernel: scsi 5:0:0:0: Unexpected response from lun 7 while scanning, scan
On 2013年10月14日 21:18, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
Hi Hannes,
On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
Hi James,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
>>>> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>>>>
>>>> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>>>> For instance, storage represents 8 iscsi LUNs, however the LUN No.7
>>>&
On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>>> special sense code asc,as
Hi Hannes,
On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>>
>> [2.] Full description
On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>
> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
> For instance, storage represents 8 iscsi LUNs, however
Hi James,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
For instance, storage represents 8 iscsi LUNs, however the LUN No.7 is
not well configured or has something wrong.
Then messages
16 matches
Mail list logo
