Re: PROBLEM: umount report "busy" on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-21 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Umount report "busy" when i try r/o remount the root filesystem at end > of > halt script. My halt script ends with: > > # Begin of halt > kill -9 -1 > umount -a > mount -n -o remount,ro / BTW is this right? Does kill -9 guarantee that all syscalls are dead by the time it returns from

Re: PROBLEM: umount report busy on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-21 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Umount report "busy" when i try r/o remount the root filesystem at end of halt script. My halt script ends with: # Begin of halt kill -9 -1 umount -a mount -n -o remount,ro / BTW is this right? Does kill -9 guarantee that all syscalls are dead by the time it returns from kernel?

PROBLEM: umount report "busy" on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-19 Thread pavelk
Umount report "busy" when i try r/o remount the root filesystem at end of halt script. My halt script ends with: # Begin of halt kill -9 -1 umount -a mount -n -o remount,ro / halt # End of halt Umount (and mount on next line too) report "/: device is busy" and the root filesystem stay not

PROBLEM: umount report busy on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-19 Thread pavelk
Umount report "busy" when i try r/o remount the root filesystem at end of halt script. My halt script ends with: # Begin of halt kill -9 -1 umount -a mount -n -o remount,ro / halt # End of halt Umount (and mount on next line too) report "/: device is busy" and the root filesystem stay not

Re: PROBLEM: umount report "busy" on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-18 Thread Gregory T. Norris
I seem to be able to reliably reproduce it as well. Let me know if I can be of any help. On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 03:38:28PM +0200, Udo A. Steinberg wrote: > This should probably be added to the 2.4.x bug-list. Since Pavel > seems to be able to constantly reproduce it, it should be possible to >

Re: PROBLEM: umount report "busy" on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-18 Thread Udo A. Steinberg
Jes Sorensen wrote: > > Pavel> Umount (and mount on next line too) report "/: device is busy" > Pavel> and the root filesystem stay not correctly unmounted. > > 2.2.13 and gcc-2.95.2 are not compatible, try with the correct > compiler first. Whatever the problem is, it's probably not a

Re: PROBLEM: umount report "busy" on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-18 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "Pavel" == pavelk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Pavel> Umount (and mount on next line too) report "/: device is busy" Pavel> and the root filesystem stay not correctly unmounted. But when Pavel> i press magic key "u" (emergency remount), the filesystem is Pavel> correctly remounted. All

PROBLEM: umount report "busy" on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-18 Thread pavelk
Umount report "busy" when i try r/o remount the root filesystem at end of halt script. My halt script ends with: # Begin of halt kill -9 -1 umount -a mount -n -o remount,ro / halt # End of halt Umount (and mount on next line too) report "/: device is busy" and the root filesystem stay not

PROBLEM: umount report busy on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-18 Thread pavelk
Umount report "busy" when i try r/o remount the root filesystem at end of halt script. My halt script ends with: # Begin of halt kill -9 -1 umount -a mount -n -o remount,ro / halt # End of halt Umount (and mount on next line too) report "/: device is busy" and the root filesystem stay not

Re: PROBLEM: umount report busy on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-18 Thread Udo A. Steinberg
Jes Sorensen wrote: Pavel Umount (and mount on next line too) report "/: device is busy" Pavel and the root filesystem stay not correctly unmounted. 2.2.13 and gcc-2.95.2 are not compatible, try with the correct compiler first. Whatever the problem is, it's probably not a compiler

Re: PROBLEM: umount report busy on r/o remount of root filesystem

2000-09-18 Thread Gregory T. Norris
I seem to be able to reliably reproduce it as well. Let me know if I can be of any help. On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 03:38:28PM +0200, Udo A. Steinberg wrote: This should probably be added to the 2.4.x bug-list. Since Pavel seems to be able to constantly reproduce it, it should be possible to