Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec

2018-12-26 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Peter, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:58 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 09:33:35PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Ok, > > > > with Segher's help I've been playing with his patch ontop of bleeding > > edge gcc 9 and here are my observations. Please double-check me for > > b

Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec

2018-12-10 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Segher, On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 3:48 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:06:02AM +0100, Boris Petkov wrote: > > On November 29, 2018 1:25:02 PM GMT+01:00, Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > >This will only be fixed from GCC 9 on, if the compiler adopts it. The > > >ke

Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec

2018-10-25 Thread Borislav Petkov
Ping. This is a good point in time, methinks, where kernel folk on CC here should have a look at this and speak up whether it is useful for us in this form. Frankly, I'm a bit unsure on the aspect of us using this and supporting old compilers which don't have it and new compilers which do. Becaus

Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec

2018-10-11 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, Nadav Amit wrote: > at 7:53 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 11:07:46AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >>> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 03:53:26PM +, Michael Matz wrote: > On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, S

Re: PROPOSAL: Extend inline asm syntax with size spec

2018-10-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 09:12:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 11:07:46AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 03:53:26PM +, Michael Matz wrot