linux.vnet.ibm.com; Peter Zijlstra
> (pet...@infradead.org); x...@kernel.org; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
> (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org); Wang, Xiaoming; Li, Zhuangzhi
> Subject: Re: Panic and page fault in loop during handling NMI backtrace
> handler
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 01:54:51 +
"Liu, Chuansheng" wrote:
> > Since the NMI iretq nesting has been fixed, there's no reason that
> I think you patch fix the infinite loop, we will have a test soon.
> BTW, we are using 3.10, could you help to point out which NMI iretq nesting
> patch?
There w
linux.vnet.ibm.com; Peter Zijlstra
> (pet...@infradead.org); x...@kernel.org; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
> (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org); Wang, Xiaoming; Li, Zhuangzhi
> Subject: Re: Panic and page fault in loop during handling NMI backtrace
> handler
>
>
> BTW
BTW, please do not send out HTML email, as that gets blocked from going
to LKML.
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 02:01:04 +
"Liu, Chuansheng" wrote:
> We meet one issue that during trigger all CPU backtrace, but during in the
> NMI handler arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler,
> It hit the PAGE faul
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:54:11 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:01:04AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > > > We meet one issue
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:17:59PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:06:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:59:15PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:48:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Tue, O
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:06:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:59:15PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:48:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 15
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:59:15PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:48:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:48:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:01:04AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > > > We meet one iss
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:01:04AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > > We meet one issue that during trigger all CPU backtrace, but during in
> > > the NMI han
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:01:04AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > > We meet one issue that during trigger all CPU backtrace, but during in
> > > the NMI han
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:01:04AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > We meet one issue that during trigger all CPU backtrace, but during in the
> > NMI handler arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler,
> > It hit the PAGE fault,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:01:04AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> We meet one issue that during trigger all CPU backtrace, but during in the
> NMI handler arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler,
> It hit the PAGE fault, then PAGE fault is in loop, at last the thread stack
> overflow, and system
13 matches
Mail list logo
