Re: [uml-devel] Re: Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-03-14 Thread Blaisorblade
Ok, I think I finally solved this problem. A note for Jeff: I forgot to send this email and complained to you because you didn't answer... Sorry Jeff. However, I explained what I say here to him in chat and we agreed on the fix. I'm sending this anyway... and I'm attaching the correct fix we di

Re: [uml-devel] Re: Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-03-07 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 05 March 2005 20:45, Jeff Dike wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without > > TT mode and WITHOUT static build it still fails with the same problem > > (__bb_init_func problem I already reported). But compiling without TT >

Re: [uml-devel] Re: Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-03-07 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > a) wrong because you say __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 4 rather than >= Correct, this is now fixed. > b) wrong because for he the link failed on __bb_init_func at the > beginning. So in the case you need to export BOTH symbols. Incorrect, the link failure was caused by tryin

Re: Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-03-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:45:18PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without > > TT mode and WITHOUT static build it still fails with the same problem > > (__bb_init_func problem I already reported). But compiling wit

Re: Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-03-05 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without > TT mode and WITHOUT static build it still fails with the same problem > (__bb_init_func problem I already reported). But compiling without TT > but WITH static build the __bb_init_func problem goes awa

Re: [uml-devel] Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-02-16 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 14 February 2005 12:35, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 17:22 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > Why not simply disable CONFIG_GCOV for him, in this case? > > > > Anton presumably turned on CONFIG_GCOV because he wanted to do some > > profiling...

Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-02-14 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 17:22 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Why not simply disable CONFIG_GCOV for him, in this case? > > Anton presumably turned on CONFIG_GCOV because he wanted to do some > profiling... Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without