On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:52:41 -0500
> Ed Cashin wrote:
>
>> This patch series applies to today's linux-next/akpm, commit
>> d3faae60d84f586ff8937b77c8476bca1b5f8ec6.
>>
>> Ed L. Cashin (8):
>> aoe: copy fallback timing information on destinati
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:52:41 -0500
Ed Cashin wrote:
> This patch series applies to today's linux-next/akpm, commit
> d3faae60d84f586ff8937b77c8476bca1b5f8ec6.
>
> Ed L. Cashin (8):
> aoe: copy fallback timing information on destination failover
> aoe: remove vestigial request queue allocatio
This patch series applies to today's linux-next/akpm, commit
d3faae60d84f586ff8937b77c8476bca1b5f8ec6.
Ed L. Cashin (8):
aoe: copy fallback timing information on destination failover
aoe: remove vestigial request queue allocation
aoe: increase default cap on outstanding AoE commands in the n
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> With respect, Rik. You haven't finished the 2.4 VM yet.
>
> It needs better design description.
> Could you please take the time to raise a commentary patch
> which describes the underlying design intent?
OK, I'll go work on this...
You are right, t
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a notable increase in people sending me patches that
> > do major things and should be 2.5 stuff. Please if you want to
> > rewrite the VM completely, redesign the scsi layer and the like
> > wait until 2.5.
>
> VM fo
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:22:58PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > probably even out of linux-kernel ...
> >
> > No. I want to see experimental stuff on l-k. That's what it's meant for.
>
> Putting the experimental stuff which isn
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:22:58PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > I agree with Alan that we should keep all experimental stuff
> > out of 2.4,
>
> Depends on the impact. Experimental stuff in MM, FS, ...
[snip]
> But, that's probably what you meant
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:22:58PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I agree with Alan that we should keep all experimental stuff
> out of 2.4,
Depends on the impact. Experimental stuff in MM, FS, ... things is something
which we don't want. If somebody writes a new driver for a device which was
not s
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2001-03-06T16:56:32,
>Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I'm getting a notable increase in people sending me patches that do major
> > things and should be 2.5 stuff. Please if you want to rewrite the VM completely,
> > redesign the scsi
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> I'm getting a notable increase in people sending me patches that
> do major things and should be 2.5 stuff. Please if you want to
> rewrite the VM completely, redesign the scsi layer and the like
> wait until 2.5.
VM folks can post their patches to [EMAIL PR
On 2001-03-06T16:56:32,
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm getting a notable increase in people sending me patches that do major
> things and should be 2.5 stuff. Please if you want to rewrite the VM completely,
> redesign the scsi layer and the like wait until 2.5.
When will 2.5 be fo
I'm getting a notable increase in people sending me patches that do major
things and should be 2.5 stuff. Please if you want to rewrite the VM completely,
redesign the scsi layer and the like wait until 2.5.
Right now I'm only collecting patches that are driver bugfix/updates, arch
specific upda
12 matches
Mail list logo
