Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> ** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
|> Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
|>
|>
|> > Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
|> > remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of han
** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
> Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
> remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the
> potential for shooting ourselves in the foot.
At 04:37 PM 10/23/00 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
>* This will _not_ be accepted into standard codebase. Don't you
>understand? Making headers C++ compatible is the first tiny
>step for doing modules in C++. Yes, from driver/module
>programmers perspective "they almost look same, and
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 08:47:53AM -0400, Linux Kernel Developer wrote:
> Please comment on the pluses and minuses of each planned task and on
> other things that you may see that should be done. Please no flames unless
> they contain useful information. Also I plan to implement the first pa
OK I've decided to give this a shot, IF there is sufficient interest out
there for C++ safe headers. So all you coders out there who have tried and
failed or who wish to program kernel modules in C++ join in and help out by
listing the errors you have encountered with the current header setup
5 matches
Mail list logo
