For Linux-2.4.0-test12 : Reiserfs-3.6.23
ftp://ftp.reiserfs.org/pub/2.4/linux-2.4.0-test12-reiserfs-3.6.23-patch.gz
See the archived message regarding this release here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=97722705425882&w=2
For Linux-2.4.0-test13-preX, the following Makefile patch is al
Testers are welcome :-)
diff -Nur --exclude=Documentation linux-vanila/fs/buffer.c linux-reiser/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-vanila/fs/buffer.cTue Dec 19 17:59:32 2000
+++ linux-reiser/fs/buffer.cTue Dec 19 16:26:55 2000
@@ -827,6 +827,10 @@
return;
}
+void set_buffer_async_io(struct
t cannot be done.
==
- Mensaje original -
De: "Carlos E. Gorges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Enviado: miƩrcoles, 13 de diciembre de 2000 14:14
Asunto: Re: Possible patch for reiserfs-3.6.22 against 2.4.0-test12
> > Hiya.
> >
> > The latest rei
> Hiya.
>
> The latest reiserfs patch on ftp.namesys.com causes compilation errors
> against test12 due to the task queue changes. Does this look correct?
>
Please, somebody can test this patch
-- BOF --
diff -ur linux-bk/fs/reiserfs/journal.c linux/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
--- linux-bk/fs/reiser
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your patch will probably let journal.c get compiled, but it might be
> dangerous to use considering what Chris said.
I've just tried it and got filesystem corruption, so no, it doesn't
work. I'll wait for someone else to provide a patch that works.
--
Adam Sampson wrote:
>The latest reiserfs patch on ftp.namesys.com causes compilation errors
>against test12 due to the task queue changes. Does this look correct?
[patch snipped]
>
>It does at least compile with these changes, but I haven't yet tested
>it. Looking at run_task_queue, it would appe
Hiya.
The latest reiserfs patch on ftp.namesys.com causes compilation errors
against test12 due to the task queue changes. Does this look correct?
--- fs/reiserfs/journal.c.orig Wed Dec 13 00:13:00 2000
+++ fs/reiserfs/journal.c Wed Dec 13 00:40:52 2000
@@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@
ct->p_s_sb
7 matches
Mail list logo