On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:29:16PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> I've just got it while running "dbench 200" over a XFS mounted
> partition. Kernel is 2.6.23. See the attachment.
..
> Dec 13 16:30:45 tst kernel: [ 917.365836]
> =
> Dec 13
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:29:16PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
I've just got it while running dbench 200 over a XFS mounted
partition. Kernel is 2.6.23. See the attachment.
..
Dec 13 16:30:45 tst kernel: [ 917.365836]
=
Dec 13
I've just got it while running "dbench 200" over a XFS mounted
partition. Kernel is 2.6.23. See the attachment.
Regards,
Vlad
Dec 13 16:17:20 tst kernel: [0.00] Linux version 2.6.23-dbg ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-51)) #17 SMP PREEMPT Thu
Oct 25
I've just got it while running dbench 200 over a XFS mounted
partition. Kernel is 2.6.23. See the attachment.
Regards,
Vlad
Dec 13 16:17:20 tst kernel: [0.00] Linux version 2.6.23-dbg ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-51)) #17 SMP PREEMPT Thu
Oct 25
Eric Sandeen schrieb:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>> On 26/04/07, David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Known false positive - XFS doesn't have the annotations needed for
>>> this yet; we've got a patch that will probably make it's way into 6.5.22
>>> that
>>> should fix most of these issues.
Eric Sandeen schrieb:
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 26/04/07, David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Known false positive - XFS doesn't have the annotations needed for
this yet; we've got a patch that will probably make it's way into 6.5.22
that
should fix most of these issues.
wow...
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 26/04/07, David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Known false positive - XFS doesn't have the annotations needed for
>> this yet; we've got a patch that will probably make it's way into 6.5.22 that
>> should fix most of these issues.
wow... 6.5.22 do we really
On 26/04/07, David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For your information :
>
> Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS
filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it.
.
>
On 26/04/07, David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Hi,
For your information :
Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS
filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it.
.
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 26/04/07, David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Known false positive - XFS doesn't have the annotations needed for
this yet; we've got a patch that will probably make it's way into 6.5.22 that
should fix most of these issues.
wow... 6.5.22 do we really have to wait
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For your information :
>
> Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS
> filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it.
.
> =
> [
Hi,
For your information :
Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS
filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it.
It doesn't happen every time - if I should try to make a guess at the frequency
I'd say about 1 in 30.
What I do is this.
1. boot
Hi,
For your information :
Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS
filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it.
It doesn't happen every time - if I should try to make a guess at the frequency
I'd say about 1 in 30.
What I do is this.
1. boot
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Hi,
For your information :
Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS
filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it.
.
=
[ INFO:
14 matches
Mail list logo
