Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Auke Kok wrote:
>>
>> Yes. A few hundred cycles of loading/unloading snd_hda_intel with
>> enable_msi=1
>> didn't break it on i386.
>>
>> I sure hope this can get into 2.6.20!
>
> Eric, can you write an explanation, add your
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Auke Kok wrote:
>
> Yes. A few hundred cycles of loading/unloading snd_hda_intel with enable_msi=1
> didn't break it on i386.
>
> I sure hope this can get into 2.6.20!
Eric, can you write an explanation, add your sign-off, Auke's ACK, and
send out the result? The patch
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Auke Kok wrote:
Yes. A few hundred cycles of loading/unloading snd_hda_intel with enable_msi=1
didn't break it on i386.
I sure hope this can get into 2.6.20!
Eric, can you write an explanation, add your sign-off, Auke's ACK, and
send out the result? The patch looked
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Auke Kok wrote:
Yes. A few hundred cycles of loading/unloading snd_hda_intel with
enable_msi=1
didn't break it on i386.
I sure hope this can get into 2.6.20!
Eric, can you write an explanation, add your sign-off, Auke's
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I highly doubt it - I've seen the problem even on this weeks git on
x86_64. Moreover, I'm at home for the weekend and testing resources are limited
:). I'll see what I can do
Thanks. There may be more to it than what I suspect,
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I highly doubt it - I've seen the problem even on this weeks git on
> x86_64. Moreover, I'm at home for the weekend and testing resources are
> limited
> :). I'll see what I can do
Thanks. There may be more to it than what I suspect, but I could not
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for
> both
> i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
> serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These tests have
> been
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for
both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These tests have
been running
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I highly doubt it - I've seen the problem even on this weeks git on
x86_64. Moreover, I'm at home for the weekend and testing resources are
limited
:). I'll see what I can do
Thanks. There may be more to it than what I suspect, but I could not
reproduce
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I highly doubt it - I've seen the problem even on this weeks git on
x86_64. Moreover, I'm at home for the weekend and testing resources are limited
:). I'll see what I can do
Thanks. There may be more to it than what I suspect, but
Auke Kok wrote:
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These tests have
been running fine until 2.6.19.
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These tests have
been running fine until 2.6.19.
git-bisecting I've
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These tests have
been running fine until 2.6.19.
git-bisecting I've
Auke Kok wrote:
Hi,
I've established a regression in the MSI vector/irq allocation routine for both
i386 and x86_64. Our test labs repeatedly modprobe/rmmod the e1000 driver for
serveral minutes which allocates msi vectors and frees them. These tests have
been running fine until 2.6.19.
18 matches
Mail list logo
