On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:13:17 -0800,
LA Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Keith Owens wrote:
>> It works, until somebody does this
>>
>> make -j 4 modules modules_install
>---
> But that doesn't work now.
Agreed, but letting modules_install parallel run increases the risk of
somebody do
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:02:03 -0800,
> LA Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This seems to serialize the delete, run the mod-installs in parallel, then run the
> >depmod when they are done.
>
> It works, until somebody does this
>
> make -j 4 modules modules_install
---
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> The only bit that could run in parallel is this one.
>
> .PHONY: $(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS))
> $(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS)) :
> $(MAKE) -C $(patsubst _modinst_%, %, $@) modules_install
>
> The erase must be done first (serial), then make modules_
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:02:03 -0800,
LA Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This seems to serialize the delete, run the mod-installs in parallel, then run the
>depmod when they are done.
It works, until somebody does this
make -j 4 modules modules_install
There is not, and never has been, any
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:44:28 -0800,
LA Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So, just about anyone I know uses make -j X [-l Y] bzImage modules, but I noticed that
>make modules_install isn't parallel safe in 2.4 -- since it takes much longer than the
>old, it would make sense to want to run it in pa
I remember reading some time back that on a pentium the difference between a
pentium in HLT vs. running was about 2-3 watts vs. 15-20 watts. Does anyone
know the difference for today's CPU's? P-III/P-IV or other archs?
How about the difference when calling the BIOS power-save feature? With
the
6 matches
Mail list logo
