On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:51:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:08:23 -0400 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > This whole file is going away in .22, and we have a viable alternative
> > in
> > > .21 (acpi-cpufreq), so I'm not overly worried about fixing th
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:08:23 -0400 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This whole file is going away in .22, and we have a viable alternative in
> > .21 (acpi-cpufreq), so I'm not overly worried about fixing this up
> > given it only shows up in debug kernels, especially at this stage in -
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:05:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> This whole file is going away in .22, and we have a viable alternative in
> .21 (acpi-cpufreq), so I'm not overly worried about fixing this up
> given it only shows up in debug kernels, especially at this stage in -rc.
>
> (Yeah,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:41:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > This means we'll call set_cpus_allowed() while in atomic state, but
> > > set_cpus_allowed() does sleepy stuff.
> >
> > Puzzled. This diff shouldn't change anything about the context we're in
> > when we call set_cpus_all
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:31:08 -0400 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 05:26:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:50:34 -0400
> > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 05:26:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:50:34 -0400
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
> > b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
> > index f43b987..824d0a2
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:50:34 -0400
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 02:33:03PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >
> > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code:
> > kondemand/0/2473
> > caller is centrino_target+0xfb/0x600
> > [<401e3646>] debu
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 02:33:03PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code:
> kondemand/0/2473
> caller is centrino_target+0xfb/0x600
> [<401e3646>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x9e/0xb0
> [<40112afb>] centrino_target+0xfb/0x600
> [<40112a00
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code:
kondemand/0/2473
caller is centrino_target+0xfb/0x600
[<401e3646>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x9e/0xb0
[<40112afb>] centrino_target+0xfb/0x600
[<40112a00>] centrino_target+0x0/0x600
[<40305bd9>] __cpufreq_driver_target+0x5c/0x6b
[] do_d
9 matches
Mail list logo
