On February 14, 2001 06:15 am, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, C. D. Thompson-Walsh wrote:
> > [This sortof follows the format of the report form in REPORTING-BUGS]
> > 1. I've found a consistent set of circumstances which will hang 2.4.x
> > kernels on my system.
> >
> > 2. If the
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, C. D. Thompson-Walsh wrote:
> [This sortof follows the format of the report form in REPORTING-BUGS]
> 1. I've found a consistent set of circumstances which will hang 2.4.x kernels
> on my system.
>
> 2. If the system is put under load to the point where it swaps heavily
>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, C. D. Thompson-Walsh wrote:
[This sortof follows the format of the report form in REPORTING-BUGS]
1. I've found a consistent set of circumstances which will hang 2.4.x kernels
on my system.
2. If the system is put under load to the point where it swaps heavily
On February 14, 2001 06:15 am, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, C. D. Thompson-Walsh wrote:
[This sortof follows the format of the report form in REPORTING-BUGS]
1. I've found a consistent set of circumstances which will hang 2.4.x
kernels on my system.
2. If the system is
[This sortof follows the format of the report form in REPORTING-BUGS]
1. I've found a consistent set of circumstances which will hang 2.4.x kernels
on my system.
2. If the system is put under load to the point where it swaps heavily
(swapping appears to be pre-requisite, based on a little
[This sortof follows the format of the report form in REPORTING-BUGS]
1. I've found a consistent set of circumstances which will hang 2.4.x kernels
on my system.
2. If the system is put under load to the point where it swaps heavily
(swapping appears to be pre-requisite, based on a little
6 matches
Mail list logo
