Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
On (28/12/13 01:50), Rafael J. Wysocki put forth the proposition: CC: +Viresh and linux-pm On Saturday, December 28, 2013 12:09:01 AM David Woodfall wrote: On (27/12/13 19:53), Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition: >On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl put forth the proposition: >>On

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
CC: +Viresh and linux-pm On Saturday, December 28, 2013 12:09:01 AM David Woodfall wrote: > On (27/12/13 19:53), Dave Woodfall put forth the > proposition: > >On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl put forth the > >proposition: > >>On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall wrote: > >> > >>>But any of the newer

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
On (27/12/13 19:53), Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition: On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl put forth the proposition: On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall wrote: But any of the newer kernel versions I've tested only give me performance and powersave. I don't use any Fedora kernel, so I

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl put forth the proposition: On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall wrote: But any of the newer kernel versions I've tested only give me performance and powersave. I don't use any Fedora kernel, so I can't tell which governors are enabled in those. You should check

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall wrote: > But any of the newer kernel versions I've tested only give me > performance and powersave. I don't use any Fedora kernel, so I can't tell which governors are enabled in those. You should check the value of "CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV" in the respective .config

Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
I recently upgraded from 3.9.0 to 3.10.17 and found that I don't have the same cpufreq governors available. I also tested with 3.12.6 and 3.13.0_rc5 with the same results. 3.9.0 tells me: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors conservative ondemand powersave userspace

Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
I recently upgraded from 3.9.0 to 3.10.17 and found that I don't have the same cpufreq governors available. I also tested with 3.12.6 and 3.13.0_rc5 with the same results. 3.9.0 tells me: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors conservative ondemand powersave userspace

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall wrote: But any of the newer kernel versions I've tested only give me performance and powersave. I don't use any Fedora kernel, so I can't tell which governors are enabled in those. You should check the value of CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV in the respective .config file

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl h...@fancy-poultry.org put forth the proposition: On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall wrote: But any of the newer kernel versions I've tested only give me performance and powersave. I don't use any Fedora kernel, so I can't tell which governors are enabled in

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
On (27/12/13 19:53), Dave Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net put forth the proposition: On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl h...@fancy-poultry.org put forth the proposition: On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall wrote: But any of the newer kernel versions I've tested only give me performance and powersave.

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
CC: +Viresh and linux-pm On Saturday, December 28, 2013 12:09:01 AM David Woodfall wrote: On (27/12/13 19:53), Dave Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net put forth the proposition: On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl h...@fancy-poultry.org put forth the proposition: On 27.12.2013, David Woodfall

Re: Problem with cpufreq and i5 since post 3.9.0

2013-12-27 Thread David Woodfall
On (28/12/13 01:50), Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net put forth the proposition: CC: +Viresh and linux-pm On Saturday, December 28, 2013 12:09:01 AM David Woodfall wrote: On (27/12/13 19:53), Dave Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net put forth the proposition: On (27/12/13 20:44), Heinz Diehl