On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:54:35PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
[...]
>
> Both B and C are cases of the whole chip acting flat busted. I would suspect
> that possibly Win2k drivers set this thing up some way that we don't recover
> from.
H...
quite possible. It's certainly true that a soft re
Eugene Kuznetsov wrote:
> The whole thing sounds to my mind as having some kind of resource,
> register, etc. which is supposed to be initialized during loading of
> drivers, but it's not done by i810_audio driver.
Sounds that way to me too. I didn't write that portion of the code, so it
will
Hello Doug,
Monday, April 23, 2001, 9:54:35 PM, you wrote:
DL> Both B and C are cases of the whole chip acting flat busted. I would suspect
DL> that possibly Win2k drivers set this thing up some way that we don't recover
DL> from. Is there any pattern like maybe "I listen to X in Win2k then re
Hello Doug,
Monday, April 23, 2001, 9:54:35 PM, you wrote:
DL> Eugene Kuznetsov wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am a happy owner of Intel D815EEA2 mother board. This board
>> comes with integrated AC-97 audio. When I try to load i810_audio
>> driver for it, driver identifies the device as
>>
Eugene Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am a happy owner of Intel D815EEA2 mother board. This board
> comes with integrated AC-97 audio. When I try to load i810_audio
> driver for it, driver identifies the device as
> "Intel 810 + AC97 Audio, version 0.02, 19:43:23 Apr 20 2001
> i810: Int
Hello,
I am a happy owner of Intel D815EEA2 mother board. This board
comes with integrated AC-97 audio. When I try to load i810_audio
driver for it, driver identifies the device as
"Intel 810 + AC97 Audio, version 0.02, 19:43:23 Apr 20 2001
i810: Intel ICH2 found at IO 0xef00 and 0xe800, IR
6 matches
Mail list logo
