On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:53:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
> > > But I do not see any benefit in doing
> > >
> > > unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
> > >
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:53:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
But I do not see any benefit in doing
unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
while (0 (signed
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> It is known bug which I reported to Andre already. Open
> drivers/ide/ide.c in favorite text editor, and replace strange
> body of ide_delay_50ms() with simple mdelay(50). Promise driver
> invokes ide_delay_50ms with interrupts disabled, so it freezes
> here forever. If
"A.Sajjad Zaidi" wrote:
> > do you understand that you can't really have raid on ide involving
> > two drives on the same channel?
>
> Is that just because of performance or are there other problems? Its working
> fine as it is, but Im considering setting up all drives as masters (2x
> ATA-100,
Mark Hahn wrote:
> > drives (all IBM-DTLA307045 s) that I realised that the cylinder/head
> > translation is different and I cant use the whole drive unless its
> > partitioned while attached to the other IDE ports.
>
> no, it's just that the bios doesn't perform the LBA geometry lie
> outside
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
> > But I do not see any benefit in doing
> >
> > unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
> > while (0 < (signed long)(timeout - jiffies));
>
> On that bit we agree.
What
> Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
> But I do not see any benefit in doing
>
> unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
> while (0 < (signed long)(timeout - jiffies));
On that bit we agree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 7 Feb 01 at 19:33, Alan Cox wrote:
> > It is known bug which I reported to Andre already. Open
> > drivers/ide/ide.c in favorite text editor, and replace strange
> > body of ide_delay_50ms() with simple mdelay(50). Promise driver
> > invokes ide_delay_50ms with interrupts disabled, so it
> It is known bug which I reported to Andre already. Open
> drivers/ide/ide.c in favorite text editor, and replace strange
> body of ide_delay_50ms() with simple mdelay(50). Promise driver
> invokes ide_delay_50ms with interrupts disabled, so it freezes
> here forever. If you have NMI watchdog,
On 7 Feb 01 at 19:12, A.Sajjad Zaidi wrote:
> I just built a system that uses a K7V motherboard with the KT133
> chipset. It has an onboard Promise PDC20265 ATA-100 controller. Im
> running RH6.2.
>
> hda: dma_intr: bad DMA status
> hda: dma_intr: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
>
I just built a system that uses a K7V motherboard with the KT133
chipset. It has an onboard Promise PDC20265 ATA-100 controller. Im
running RH6.2.
I built a 2.4.1 kernel with support for the controller and it booted up
fine with the "ide=reverse" parameter. It was when I tried adding new
drives
I just built a system that uses a K7V motherboard with the KT133
chipset. It has an onboard Promise PDC20265 ATA-100 controller. Im
running RH6.2.
I built a 2.4.1 kernel with support for the controller and it booted up
fine with the "ide=reverse" parameter. It was when I tried adding new
drives
It is known bug which I reported to Andre already. Open
drivers/ide/ide.c in favorite text editor, and replace strange
body of ide_delay_50ms() with simple mdelay(50). Promise driver
invokes ide_delay_50ms with interrupts disabled, so it freezes
here forever. If you have NMI watchdog, you'll
On 7 Feb 01 at 19:33, Alan Cox wrote:
It is known bug which I reported to Andre already. Open
drivers/ide/ide.c in favorite text editor, and replace strange
body of ide_delay_50ms() with simple mdelay(50). Promise driver
invokes ide_delay_50ms with interrupts disabled, so it freezes
Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
But I do not see any benefit in doing
unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
while (0 (signed long)(timeout - jiffies));
On that bit we agree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
But I do not see any benefit in doing
unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
while (0 (signed long)(timeout - jiffies));
On that bit we agree.
What do you want
Mark Hahn wrote:
drives (all IBM-DTLA307045 s) that I realised that the cylinder/head
translation is different and I cant use the whole drive unless its
partitioned while attached to the other IDE ports.
no, it's just that the bios doesn't perform the LBA geometry lie
outside the
"A.Sajjad Zaidi" wrote:
do you understand that you can't really have raid on ide involving
two drives on the same channel?
Is that just because of performance or are there other problems? Its working
fine as it is, but Im considering setting up all drives as masters (2x
ATA-100, 2x
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
It is known bug which I reported to Andre already. Open
drivers/ide/ide.c in favorite text editor, and replace strange
body of ide_delay_50ms() with simple mdelay(50). Promise driver
invokes ide_delay_50ms with interrupts disabled, so it freezes
here forever. If you
19 matches
Mail list logo
