Martin Povolný wrote:
For me it works with 20319, but I don't understand the difference
between different settings.
20319 is 4 port SATA.
2037x is 2 port SATA, optionally with 1 PATA port
20619 is 4 port PATA
So I believe 20319 is the correct option.
Jeff, the chip on the TX4200 is actually a
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Martin Povolný wrote:
>
>> We are succesfully running patched sata_promise with 3 disks in a
>> raid5/raid1 setup. (Patched against ubuntu linux-image 2.6.11-1-686
>> package.)
>
>
> Could you please either send in your patch, or tell me which board_
> setti
Hi Martin,
Martin Povolný wrote:
We are succesfully running patched sata_promise with 3 disks in a
raid5/raid1 setup. (Patched against ubuntu linux-image 2.6.11-1-686
package.)
Could you please either send in your patch, or tell me which board_ setting
(2037x/20319/20619) the device ID table
Hi,
I recieved an email from someone claiming to be stuck with Linux 2.4, due to
relying on a Promise TX4200 disk controller (using the fdsata driver from
promise's website, which is 2.4-only):
:01:09.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc.: Unknown device
3519 (rev 02)
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recieved an email from someone claiming to be stuck with Linux 2.4,
> due to relying on a Promise TX4200 disk controller (using the fdsata
> driver from promise's website, which is 2.4-only):
>
> :01:09.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc.: Unknown
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
