On 13 April 2015 at 01:50, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-26 16:40:54)
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the
>> programmable clock driver is not forwarding set_rate() requests to its
>> parent, meaning that, if the PLLB is set t
Hi Mike,
Oops, it seems I should have answered to this email before answering to
the previous one :-(.
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 16:50:21 -0700
Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-26 16:40:54)
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the
>
Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-26 16:40:54)
> Hello,
>
> I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the
> programmable clock driver is not forwarding set_rate() requests to its
> parent, meaning that, if the PLLB is set to 0, it will choose another
> parent which might be inappro
Hello,
I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the
programmable clock driver is not forwarding set_rate() requests to its
parent, meaning that, if the PLLB is set to 0, it will choose another
parent which might be inappropriate to generate the requested clock.
ITOH, if we author
4 matches
Mail list logo