Re: Propagating clock rate constraints

2015-04-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 13 April 2015 at 01:50, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-26 16:40:54) >> Hello, >> >> I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the >> programmable clock driver is not forwarding set_rate() requests to its >> parent, meaning that, if the PLLB is set t

Re: Propagating clock rate constraints

2015-04-14 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Mike, Oops, it seems I should have answered to this email before answering to the previous one :-(. On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 16:50:21 -0700 Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-26 16:40:54) > > Hello, > > > > I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the >

Re: Propagating clock rate constraints

2015-04-12 Thread Michael Turquette
Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-26 16:40:54) > Hello, > > I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the > programmable clock driver is not forwarding set_rate() requests to its > parent, meaning that, if the PLLB is set to 0, it will choose another > parent which might be inappro

Propagating clock rate constraints

2015-03-26 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hello, I recently had a problem with the at91 clk implementation: the programmable clock driver is not forwarding set_rate() requests to its parent, meaning that, if the PLLB is set to 0, it will choose another parent which might be inappropriate to generate the requested clock. ITOH, if we author