Re: [GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:22:54PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:52:24 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > The patchset used to contain lots of debugging support which wildly > > duplicated thigs which we already did and was generally overdone. That > > appears to all have been cl

Re: [GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:52:24 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT) > Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > > > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from > > &g

Re: [GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from > > git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus > > > > The UBI tree has been i

Re: [GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > > > > > Lin

Re: [GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > > > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from > > > git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for

Re: [GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from > > git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus > > > > The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and w

Re: [GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from > git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus > > The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to > see it in the mainline. Quite frankly, I have absolutely _zero_ visi

[GIT-PULL] please pull UBI tree

2007-04-27 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to see it in the mainline. We have several groups using UBI now and it has proved to be fairly stable. We've also got some feedback from comm

Re: Pull UBI tree

2007-02-14 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:08 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Please send out a current version for review instead. Last time I looked > at it lots of things looked quite over-engineered, and I'd like to check > if this has been improved since. The patch is big and LKML does filtered the mail. Ac

Re: Pull UBI tree

2007-02-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Hello Linus, > > The UBI tree has been in -mm for a few releases now and we would like to > to see it in the mainline. Please send out a current version for review instead. Last time I looked at it lots of things looked quite ov

Pull UBI tree

2007-02-13 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Hello Linus, The UBI tree has been in -mm for a few releases now and we would like to to see it in the mainline. We have several groups using the code now and it has proved to be fairly stable thus far. We've also got some feedback from people outside the community. In short, UBI is kind of LVM