On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 7:54 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 07:30:30PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I was parsing the Data-Structures document and had a question about
> > the following "Important note" text.
> >
> > Could it be clarified in the below t
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 07:31:37PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 7:30 PM Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I was parsing the Data-Structures document and had a question about
> > the following "Important note" text.
> >
> > Could it be clarified in the below t
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 07:30:30PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I was parsing the Data-Structures document and had a question about
> the following "Important note" text.
>
> Could it be clarified in the below text better why "remaining
> callbacks are placed back on the RCU_DONE_T
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 7:30 PM Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I was parsing the Data-Structures document and had a question about
> the following "Important note" text.
>
> Could it be clarified in the below text better why "remaining
> callbacks are placed back on the RCU_DONE_TAIL segme
Hi Paul,
I was parsing the Data-Structures document and had a question about
the following "Important note" text.
Could it be clarified in the below text better why "remaining
callbacks are placed back on the RCU_DONE_TAIL segment", is a reason
for not depending on ->head for determining if no ca
5 matches
Mail list logo