Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-26 Thread Kristoffer Ericson
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:40:14 -0500 "Dmitry Torokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 25, 2007 11:30 PM, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > > Why I want to use 600-series/700-series instead of 6XX/7XX is simply

Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Nov 25, 2007 11:30 PM, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > Why I want to use 600-series/700-series instead of 6XX/7XX is simply > > because 600-series/700-series leaves no doubt. > > > Apparently your end users are

Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-26 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Nov 25, 2007 11:30 PM, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: Why I want to use 600-series/700-series instead of 6XX/7XX is simply because 600-series/700-series leaves no doubt. Apparently your end users are more

Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-26 Thread Kristoffer Ericson
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:40:14 -0500 Dmitry Torokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 25, 2007 11:30 PM, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: Why I want to use 600-series/700-series instead of 6XX/7XX is simply because

Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > For instance an hp 620 user thought that their system was unsupported > because everything was for '680'. Or the other way round 728 users > didn't want to use 720 since they thought they would loose their extra > ram (only

Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-25 Thread Kristoffer Ericson
Greetings, Just want some input before I start dropping patches everywhere. A simple ack will do nicely if you just agree. Currently we use the name of the most typical HP Jornada (680 and 720) to mean all 6XX/7XX (= 620/660/680/690 and 720/720/728). In the past this has led to some confusion

Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-25 Thread Kristoffer Ericson
Greetings, Just want some input before I start dropping patches everywhere. A simple ack will do nicely if you just agree. Currently we use the name of the most typical HP Jornada (680 and 720) to mean all 6XX/7XX (= 620/660/680/690 and 720/720/728). In the past this has led to some confusion

Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)

2007-11-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: For instance an hp 620 user thought that their system was unsupported because everything was for '680'. Or the other way round 728 users didn't want to use 720 since they thought they would loose their extra ram (only