On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:01:55 +
Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:37:14PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Trying to wrap my head around sm501. From what I can tell an mfd driver is
> > a "master" driver that takes control of all
> >
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:01:55 +
Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:37:14PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
Greetings,
Trying to wrap my head around sm501. From what I can tell an mfd driver is
a master driver that takes control of all
memory and io
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:37:14PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Trying to wrap my head around sm501. From what I can tell an mfd driver is a
> "master" driver that takes control of all
> memory and io areas. It then hands out areas of those to drivers. Anywhere
> near
Greetings,
Trying to wrap my head around sm501. From what I can tell an mfd driver is a
"master" driver that takes control of all
memory and io areas. It then hands out areas of those to drivers. Anywhere near
correct?
I can see some benefit but still hard for me to motivate. What am I
Greetings,
Trying to wrap my head around sm501. From what I can tell an mfd driver is a
master driver that takes control of all
memory and io areas. It then hands out areas of those to drivers. Anywhere near
correct?
I can see some benefit but still hard for me to motivate. What am I missing?
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:37:14PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
Greetings,
Trying to wrap my head around sm501. From what I can tell an mfd driver is a
master driver that takes control of all
memory and io areas. It then hands out areas of those to drivers. Anywhere
near correct?
6 matches
Mail list logo
