Re: RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when it should not

2013-03-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote: > > 64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in > > arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and > >

Re: RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when it should not

2013-03-16 Thread Paul Bolle
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote: > 64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in > arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and > arch/x86/um/Kconfig. > > I do not know if there are any bad consequences about

RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when it should not

2013-03-16 Thread Martin Walch
At drivers/staging/zcache/Kconfig:13 it says config RAMSTER bool "Cross-machine RAM capacity sharing, aka peer-to-peer tmem" depends on CONFIGFS_FS=y && SYSFS=y && !HIGHMEM && ZCACHE=y depends on NET # must ensure struct page is 8-byte aligned select

RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when it should not

2013-03-16 Thread Martin Walch
At drivers/staging/zcache/Kconfig:13 it says config RAMSTER bool Cross-machine RAM capacity sharing, aka peer-to-peer tmem depends on CONFIGFS_FS=y SYSFS=y !HIGHMEM ZCACHE=y depends on NET # must ensure struct page is 8-byte aligned select

Re: RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when it should not

2013-03-16 Thread Paul Bolle
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote: 64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and arch/x86/um/Kconfig. I do not know if there are any bad consequences about this,

Re: RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when it should not

2013-03-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote: 64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and arch/x86/um/Kconfig.