On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote:
> > 64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in
> > arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and
> >
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote:
> 64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in
> arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and
> arch/x86/um/Kconfig.
>
> I do not know if there are any bad consequences about
At drivers/staging/zcache/Kconfig:13 it says
config RAMSTER
bool "Cross-machine RAM capacity sharing, aka peer-to-peer tmem"
depends on CONFIGFS_FS=y && SYSFS=y && !HIGHMEM && ZCACHE=y
depends on NET
# must ensure struct page is 8-byte aligned
select
At drivers/staging/zcache/Kconfig:13 it says
config RAMSTER
bool Cross-machine RAM capacity sharing, aka peer-to-peer tmem
depends on CONFIGFS_FS=y SYSFS=y !HIGHMEM ZCACHE=y
depends on NET
# must ensure struct page is 8-byte aligned
select
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote:
64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in
arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and
arch/x86/um/Kconfig.
I do not know if there are any bad consequences about this,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote:
64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in
arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and
arch/x86/um/Kconfig.
6 matches
Mail list logo