On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an
> > intermediate state
> > > before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
> state
> > before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
> its
> > own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
state
before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
its
own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we want
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an
intermediate state
before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
> state
> > before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
> its
> > own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH
> We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
> state
> before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
> its
> own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we want it to be
> upstream
> to make the development of full
We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
state
before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
its
own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we want it to be
upstream
to make the development of full
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
state
before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
its
own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we want
8 matches
Mail list logo