RE: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-02-05 Thread Ricky Beam
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Ricky Beam wrote: >Interesting... I just checked my machine (2.4.1-SMP) to see it only saw >64MB when it has 256MB. ... >Nothing at all has changed in either the BIOS setup, compiler, etc. All I >did was reboot (and not pay it any attention.) The configuration was the >same

RE: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-02-05 Thread Ricky Beam
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Dunlap, Randy wrote: ... Interesting... I just checked my machine (2.4.1-SMP) to see it only saw 64MB when it has 256MB. >From 2.4.0-test5: Linux version 2.4.0-test5-SMP (root@chickenboo) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #12 SMP Thu Aug 10

RE: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-02-05 Thread Ricky Beam
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Dunlap, Randy wrote: ... Interesting... I just checked my machine (2.4.1-SMP) to see it only saw 64MB when it has 256MB. From 2.4.0-test5: Linux version 2.4.0-test5-SMP (root@chickenboo) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #12 SMP Thu Aug 10

RE: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-02-05 Thread Ricky Beam
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Ricky Beam wrote: Interesting... I just checked my machine (2.4.1-SMP) to see it only saw 64MB when it has 256MB. ... Nothing at all has changed in either the BIOS setup, compiler, etc. All I did was reboot (and not pay it any attention.) The configuration was the same

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
Dunlap, Randy wrote: >> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: >>> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > >> ... >> Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version

RE: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > > > >>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > >>> > ... > Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 > >>> > >>

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > > > >> 2.4.1 detects 64 MB, but 2.4.0 detects 192 (Maybe 191, not sure). > >> ... > >> Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 >19990314/Linux

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
Mikael Pettersson wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > >>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: >>> 2.4.1 detects 64 MB, but 2.4.0 detects 192 (Maybe 191, not sure). ... Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
Mikael Pettersson wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > >> 2.4.1 detects 64 MB, but 2.4.0 detects 192 (Maybe 191, not sure). >> ... >> Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #9 Tue Jan 30

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Dr. David Gilbert
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Why on earth is this fairly recent motherboard using BIOS-88 > to report available memory? I would have expected E820 here. > Can you send the dmesg output from 2.4.0 and/or 2.2.19pre7? Is it one of these motherboards which has an option setting

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: >2.4.1 detects 64 MB, but 2.4.0 detects 192 (Maybe 191, not sure). >... >Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux >(egcs-1.1.2 release)) #9 Tue Jan 30 15:35:21 EST 2001 >BIOS-provided physical RAM

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: 2.4.1 detects 64 MB, but 2.4.0 detects 192 (Maybe 191, not sure). ... Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #9 Tue Jan 30 15:35:21 EST 2001 BIOS-provided physical RAM map:

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
Mikael Pettersson wrote: On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: 2.4.1 detects 64 MB, but 2.4.0 detects 192 (Maybe 191, not sure). ... Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66

RE: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Dunlap, Randy
From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: ... Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release))

Re: [BUG] 2.4.1 Detects 64 MB RAM, actual 192MB

2001-01-31 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
Dunlap, Randy wrote: From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: ... Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux