On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:56:28PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020, 15:15:55 CEST schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>
> Hi Willy,
>
> > > And this is all ???
> >
> > Possibly a lot of people got used to seeing the numerous versions
> > and are less attentive to new series, it's
Eric Biggers writes:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>>
>> Would some maintainer please comment on potential problems or
>> shortcomings?
>>
>
> Well, very people are experts in the Linux RNG *and* have time to review large
> patchsets, especially when three
Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2020, 06:24:09 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers:
Hi Eric,
>
> Note that having multiple RNG implementations would cause fragmentation,
> more maintenance burden, etc. So IMO, that should be a last resort.
> Instead we should try to find an implementation that works for
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> Almost two weeks passed and these are the "relevant" replies:
>
> Jason personally does not like FIPS, and is afraid of
> "subpar crypto". Albeit this patch set strictly isn't about
> crypto at all; the crypto subsystem is in the
Cerri
> ; Neil Horman ; Randy Dunlap
> ; Julia Lawall
> ; Dan Carpenter ; Andy Lavr
> ; Eric Biggers
> ; Jason A. Donenfeld ; Stephan Müller
> ; Petr Tesarik
>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION PATCH 00/41] random: possible ways towards NIST
> SP800-90B compliance
>
>
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:39:35PM +, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote:
> > Then your company can not contribute in Linux kernel development, as
> > this is obviously not allowed by such a footer.
> >
> Interesting, this has never been raised as a problem until today ...
> Going back through my mail
ndy Lutomirski ;
>> Florian Weimer ; Lennart
>> Poettering ; Peter Matthias
>> ; Marcelo Henrique Cerri
>> ; Neil Horman ; Randy
>> Dunlap ; Julia Lawall
>> ; Dan Carpenter ; Andy Lavr
>> ; Eric Biggers
>> ; Jason A. Donenfeld ; Stephan Müller
>
Cerri
> ; Neil Horman ; Randy Dunlap
> ; Julia Lawall
> ; Dan Carpenter ; Andy Lavr
> ; Eric Biggers
> ; Jason A. Donenfeld ; Stephan Müller
> ; Petr Tesarik
>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION PATCH 00/41] random: possible ways towards NIST
> SP800-90B compliance
>
>
gt; > ; William Jon McCann ;
> > zhangjs ; Andy Lutomirski ;
> > Florian Weimer ; Lennart
> > Poettering ; Peter Matthias
> > ; Marcelo Henrique Cerri
> > ; Neil Horman ; Randy
> > Dunlap ; Julia Lawall
> > ; Dan Carpenter ; Andy
> > Lavr ; Er
Cerri
> ; Neil Horman ; Randy Dunlap
> ; Julia Lawall
> ; Dan Carpenter ; Andy Lavr
> ; Eric Biggers
> ; Jason A. Donenfeld ; Stephan Müller
> ; Petr Tesarik
>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION PATCH 00/41] random: possible ways towards NIST
> SP800-90B compliance
>
>
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:33:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:15:55PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > > Almost two weeks passed and these are the "relevant" replies:
> > >
> > > Jason personally
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:35:18PM +, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote:
> ** This message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). It may contain information that is confidential and privileged.
> If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are
Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020, 15:15:55 CEST schrieb Willy Tarreau:
Hi Willy,
> > And this is all ???
>
> Possibly a lot of people got used to seeing the numerous versions
> and are less attentive to new series, it's possible that your message
> will wake everyone up.
I think that points to my
er Matthias
> ; Marcelo Henrique Cerri
> ; Neil Horman ;
> Randy Dunlap ; Julia Lawall ;
> Dan Carpenter ; Andy Lavr
> ; Eric Biggers ; Jason A. Donenfeld
> ; Stephan Müller
> ; Petr Tesarik
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION PATCH 00/41] random: possible ways towards NIST
>
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:15:55PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > Almost two weeks passed and these are the "relevant" replies:
> >
> > Jason personally does not like FIPS, and is afraid of
> > "subpar crypto". Albeit this patch set
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> Almost two weeks passed and these are the "relevant" replies:
>
> Jason personally does not like FIPS, and is afraid of
> "subpar crypto". Albeit this patch set strictly isn't about
> crypto at all; the crypto subsystem is in the
Almost two weeks passed and these are the "relevant" replies:
Jason personally does not like FIPS, and is afraid of
"subpar crypto". Albeit this patch set strictly isn't about
crypto at all; the crypto subsystem is in the unlucky position
to just depend on a good entropy source.
Greg claims that
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:21:52 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:40:37AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 21. September 2020, 09:58:16 CEST schrieb Nicolai
> > > Stange:
> > >
> > > > -
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:40:37AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > Am Montag, 21. September 2020, 09:58:16 CEST schrieb Nicolai Stange:
> >
> > > - people dislike the approach of having two competing implementations for
> > >
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:40:37AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. September 2020, 09:58:16 CEST schrieb Nicolai Stange:
>
> > - people dislike the approach of having two competing implementations for
> > what is basically the same functionality in the kernel.
>
> Is this really
Am Montag, 21. September 2020, 09:58:16 CEST schrieb Nicolai Stange:
Hi Nicolai,
> Hi all,
>
> first of all, my apologies for the patch bomb following up in reply to this
> mail here -- it's not meant to receive any serious review at all, but only
> to support the discussion I'm hoping to get
I haven't looked into the details of this patchset yet, but your
description here indicates to me that this is motivated by FIPS
certification desires, which...worries me. I would like to rewrite the
RNG at some point, and I've started to work on a bunch of designs for
this (and proving them
22 matches
Mail list logo