On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 05:01:52 PM Brown, Len wrote:
> > >> Pulled, thanks Tony!
> > >>
> > >> Len, are you fine with this route [tip:x86/ras tree] for the
> > >> drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c changes?
> > >
> > > Yes, the RAS guys basically own that code.
> >
> > These patches also got picked up
> >> Pulled, thanks Tony!
> >>
> >> Len, are you fine with this route [tip:x86/ras tree] for the
> >> drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c changes?
> >
> > Yes, the RAS guys basically own that code.
>
> These patches also got picked up by Rafael and are in his ACPI tree
> too. I think the patches were applie
>> Pulled, thanks Tony!
>>
>> Len, are you fine with this route [tip:x86/ras tree] for the
>> drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c changes?
>
> Yes, the RAS guys basically own that code.
These patches also got picked up by Rafael and are in his ACPI tree
too. I think the patches were applied identically, so
+rafael
> Pulled, thanks Tony!
>
> Len, are you fine with this route [tip:x86/ras tree] for the
> drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c changes?
Yes, the RAS guys basically own that code.
thanks,
-Len
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to ma
* Luck, Tony wrote:
> The following changes since commit d683b96b072dc4680fc74964eca77e6a23d1fa6e:
>
> Linux 3.10-rc4 (2013-06-02 17:11:17 +0900)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git
> tags/please-pull-einj
>
> for you
5 matches
Mail list logo