Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Sedat Dilek writes: > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Sedat Dilek writes: > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

Sedat Dilek writes: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed,

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

Sedat Dilek writes: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! >

RE: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On 2016.12.28 14:33 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Tue, Dec 27, 2016

RE: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On 2016.12.28 14:33 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: P.S.: Revert "cpu/hotplug:

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > Hi, > > I

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> Hi! >>> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] Hi, I have

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> Hi! >>> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] Hi, I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system >>> and I see some

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system >>> and I see some call-traces. >>> It is reproducible on

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system >> and I see some call-traces. >> It is reproducible on suspend and resume. >> >> I cannot say

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system >> and I see some call-traces. >> It is reproducible on suspend and resume. >> >> I cannot say which area

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

Hi! > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > Hi, > > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system > and I see some call-traces. > It is reproducible on suspend and resume. > > I cannot say which area touches the problem or if these are several > independent problems. >

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

Hi! > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > Hi, > > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system > and I see some call-traces. > It is reproducible on suspend and resume. > > I cannot say which area touches the problem or if these are several > independent problems. >

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:24:42AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > [ Add some

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:24:42AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >>> > >>> > Hi,

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:24:42AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:24:42AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:24:42AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > > > Hi, > > > > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system > > and I see some call-traces. > > It is

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:24:42AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > > > Hi, > > > > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system > > and I see some call-traces. > > It is

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > Hi, > > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system > and I see some call-traces. > It is reproducible on suspend and resume. > > I cannot say which area touches the

Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:09:22AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > Hi, > > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system > and I see some call-traces. > It is reproducible on suspend and resume. > > I cannot say which area touches the