Le Mardi 12 Juillet 2005 01:41, Protasevich, Natalie a écrit :
>
> Another thing is that you are getting large number of
> interrupts on the VIA device, whereas there is no any on 2.4. Does the
> chipset get enabled differently?
I believe this interruption is for the sound module. The /proc/interr
> >Michel,
> >When you get chance, maybe you could boot the OS that used to work
for you (you mentioned 2.4) and provide the boot trace and
/proc/interrupts for comparison.
> # cat /proc/interrupts - 2.4:
>CPU0
> 0: 32095IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1:968IO-APIC-edge
Le Lundi 11 Juillet 2005 23:25, Protasevich, Natalie a écrit :
> When you get chance, maybe you could boot the OS that used to work for you
> (you mentioned 2.4) and provide the boot trace and /proc/interrupts for
> comparison.
Here it goes. Kernel is a somewhat custom ;-) 2.4.28:
# uname -r
2.4.
> Le Lundi 11 Juillet 2005 22:58, Michel Bouissou a écrit :
> >
> > Oh no :-(
>
> Well, I give up for tonight :-(
>
> This time I rebooted with the mouse disabled in BIOS, with
> the usb-handoff option, with the scanner unplugged... And it
> went wrong simply by itself.
> "irq 21: nobody cared
Le Lundi 11 Juillet 2005 22:58, Michel Bouissou a écrit :
>
> Oh no :-(
Well, I give up for tonight :-(
This time I rebooted with the mouse disabled in BIOS, with the usb-handoff
option, with the scanner unplugged... And it went wrong simply by itself.
"irq 21: nobody cared!"
The only thing I'
5 matches
Mail list logo
