Re: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM

2014-11-14 Thread Colin Cross
r.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM >> >> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:44:22PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Pankaj Dubey wrote: &

RE: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM

2014-11-13 Thread Pankaj Dubey
+CC: Colin Cross, James Hogan On Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:30 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > To: Russell King - ARM Linux > Cc: Pankaj Dubey; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM > &

Re: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM

2014-11-13 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:44:22PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > > > If BL_SWITCHER is enabled but SUSPEND and CPU_IDLE is not enabled > > > we are getting following config warning. > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM

2014-11-13 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:44:22PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > > If BL_SWITCHER is enabled but SUSPEND and CPU_IDLE is not enabled > > we are getting following config warning. > > > > warning: (BL_SWITCHER) selects CPU_PM which has unmet direct > > d

Re: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM

2014-11-13 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > If BL_SWITCHER is enabled but SUSPEND and CPU_IDLE is not enabled > we are getting following config warning. > > warning: (BL_SWITCHER) selects CPU_PM which has unmet direct > dependencies (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE) > > So BL_SWITCHER should enable CPU_PM on