Re: [PATCH] Docs: dt: Be explicit and consistent in reference to IOMMU specifiers

2016-12-19 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote: > The generic IOMMU binding says that the meaning of an 'IOMMU specifier' > is defined by the binding of a specific SMMU. The ARM SMMU binding > never explicitly uses the term 'specifier' at all. Update implicit > references to use the

RE: [PATCH] Docs: dt: Be explicit and consistent in reference to IOMMU specifiers

2016-12-16 Thread Stuart Yoder
ndation.org; will.dea...@arm.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs: dt: Be explicit and consistent in reference to > IOMMU specifiers > > Hi Stuart, > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > The generic IOMMU binding says that the meaning of an 'I

Re: [PATCH] Docs: dt: Be explicit and consistent in reference to IOMMU specifiers

2016-12-16 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:08:09PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Rutland [mailto:mark.rutl...@arm.com] > > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > > In the iommu-map binding change references to iommu-specifier to > > > "

Re: [PATCH] Docs: dt: Be explicit and consistent in reference to IOMMU specifiers

2016-12-16 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Stuart, On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote: > The generic IOMMU binding says that the meaning of an 'IOMMU specifier' > is defined by the binding of a specific SMMU. The ARM SMMU binding > never explicitly uses the term 'specifier' at all. Update implicit > reference