> I didn't get the same result..In my case, it's working fine.
> But as Bing's result, i will check more and share the result.
I want to add that my kernel is from "cros/release-R26-3701.B" branch with this
HEAD:
4e13a9c CHERRY-PICK: UPSTREAM: loop: prevent bdev freeing while device in use
I didn't get the same result..In my case, it's working fine.
But as Bing's result, i will check more and share the result.
I want to add that my kernel is from cros/release-R26-3701.B branch with this
HEAD:
4e13a9c CHERRY-PICK: UPSTREAM: loop: prevent bdev freeing while device in use
Hi Seungwon,
I didn't get the same result..In my case, it's working fine.
But as Bing's result, i will check more and share the result.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 06/26/2013 10:53 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> Do you have the same result?
> Could you share the result?
>
>
Hi Seungwon,
I didn't get the same result..In my case, it's working fine.
But as Bing's result, i will check more and share the result.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 06/26/2013 10:53 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Hi Jaehoon,
Do you have the same result?
Could you share the result?
Thanks,
Hi Jaehoon,
Do you have the same result?
Could you share the result?
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
On Tuesday, June 25 2013, Bing Zhao wrote:
> > I think the proposal on the table is to take Seungwon's patches
> > instead of mine. Assuming they solve your problems, I'm OK with that.
> > I think he was
Hi Jaehoon,
Do you have the same result?
Could you share the result?
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
On Tuesday, June 25 2013, Bing Zhao wrote:
I think the proposal on the table is to take Seungwon's patches
instead of mine. Assuming they solve your problems, I'm OK with that.
I think he was
> I think the proposal on the table is to take Seungwon's patches
> instead of mine. Assuming they solve your problems, I'm OK with that.
> I think he was requesting testing the first of his two patches alone
> and then both of his two patches together.
Test #1: Swungwon's patch #1 alone [1]
I think the proposal on the table is to take Seungwon's patches
instead of mine. Assuming they solve your problems, I'm OK with that.
I think he was requesting testing the first of his two patches alone
and then both of his two patches together.
Test #1: Swungwon's patch #1 alone [1]
Test
Bing,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
>> > I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
>> >
>> > Without this patch, mmc got hung_task and rebooted eventually.
>> > With this patch applied, mmc returns CRC error instead of hung_task, and
>> > the error is handled
>>
Bing,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Bing Zhao bz...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
Without this patch, mmc got hung_task and rebooted eventually.
With this patch applied, mmc returns CRC error instead of hung_task, and
the error is handled
Hi All,
I tested with Seungwon's patch and this patch.
I'm agreed with Seungwon's opinion.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 06/18/2013 09:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Seungwon,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>
Hi All,
I tested with Seungwon's patch and this patch.
I'm agreed with Seungwon's opinion.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 06/18/2013 09:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Seungwon,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
Hi Doug,
> > I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
> >
> > Without this patch, mmc got hung_task and rebooted eventually.
> > With this patch applied, mmc returns CRC error instead of hung_task, and
> > the error is handled
> gracefully.
>
> Have you tried one or both or Seungwon's fixes
Bing,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Seungwon,
>
>> > I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
>> > the patches. You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
>> > patches, right?
>> Did you test the patch?
>> I wonder that both are
Hi Seungwon,
> > I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
> > the patches. You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
> > patches, right?
> Did you test the patch?
> I wonder that both are good for your side.
I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Seungwon,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> >> > There are two solutions we have applied.
> >>
> >> I'm a little confused. Have you already applied one or both of the
> >> solutions you list below, or are you
On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Seungwon,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
There are two solutions we have applied.
I'm a little confused. Have you already applied one or both of the
solutions you list below, or are you
Hi Seungwon,
I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
the patches. You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
patches, right?
Did you test the patch?
I wonder that both are good for your side.
I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
Without
Bing,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Bing Zhao bz...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi Seungwon,
I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
the patches. You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
patches, right?
Did you test the patch?
I wonder that both
Hi Doug,
I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
Without this patch, mmc got hung_task and rebooted eventually.
With this patch applied, mmc returns CRC error instead of hung_task, and
the error is handled
gracefully.
Have you tried one or both or Seungwon's fixes without mine?
Seungwon,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>> > There are two solutions we have applied.
>>
>> I'm a little confused. Have you already applied one or both of the
>> solutions you list below, or are you proposing them as alternates to
>> the patch I submitted?
> Yes, first
Seungwon,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
There are two solutions we have applied.
I'm a little confused. Have you already applied one or both of the
solutions you list below, or are you proposing them as alternates to
the patch I submitted?
On 04/10/2013 04:02 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 09, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Seungwon,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>>> I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
>>
>> Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
>>
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Seungwon,
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
>
> Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
> has an SDIO WiFi module by Marvell. Bing Zhao
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Seungwon,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
has an SDIO WiFi module by Marvell.
On 04/10/2013 04:02 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Seungwon,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part
Seungwon,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
has an SDIO WiFi module by Marvell. Bing Zhao (CCed) has a unit in
hand that generates lots of CRC errors and
On Friday, April 05, 2013, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> You're right..it's something wrong.
> Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
>
> I will check until next week after test.
Doug Anderson, Jaehoon Chung,
Sorry for late response.
Could I explain
On Friday, April 05, 2013, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi Doug,
You're right..it's something wrong.
Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
I will check until next week after test.
Doug Anderson, Jaehoon Chung,
Sorry for late response.
Could I explain this
Seungwon,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
has an SDIO WiFi module by Marvell. Bing Zhao (CCed) has a unit in
hand that generates lots
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 04/05/2013 05:18 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> You're right..it's something wrong.
> Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
>
> I will check until next week after
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 04/05/2013 05:18 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi Doug,
You're right..it's something wrong.
Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
I will check until
Hi Doug,
You're right..it's something wrong.
Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
I will check until next week after test.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/27/2013 03:06 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Jaehoon,
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Jaehoon
Hi Doug,
You're right..it's something wrong.
Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
I will check until next week after test.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/27/2013 03:06 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Jaehoon,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Jaehoon
Jaehoon,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Great..i have found the problem like this.
> I will check your patch..and share the result.
Did you have any time to check this patch?
Thanks!
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Jaehoon,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
Great..i have found the problem like this.
I will check your patch..and share the result.
Did you have any time to check this patch?
Thanks!
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Doug,
Great..i have found the problem like this.
I will check your patch..and share the result.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/16/2013 06:29 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On a flaky piece of hardware that seems good at generating CRC errors,
> we have found that often times the CRC errors
Hi Doug,
Great..i have found the problem like this.
I will check your patch..and share the result.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/16/2013 06:29 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
On a flaky piece of hardware that seems good at generating CRC errors,
we have found that often times the CRC errors
38 matches
Mail list logo
