On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:46 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to
> > > unconditionally
> > > setup the hrtimer based
Hi, Russell,
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to
> > > unconditionally setup the hrtimer based broadcast even if it's never
> used.
> > >
> > >
Hi, Russell,
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to
> > > unconditionally setup the hrtimer based broadcast even if it's never
> used.
> > >
> > >
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to unconditionally
> > setup the hrtimer based broadcast even if it's never used.
> >
> > Up to the arch maintainer
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I have no real opinion about that patch. It does no harm to unconditionally
> > setup the hrtimer based broadcast even if it's never used.
> >
> > Up to the arch maintainer
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> > > Hi, Arnd,
> > >
> > > Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Alison,
> >
> > I'm
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> > > Hi, Arnd,
> > >
> > > Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Alison,
> >
> > I'm
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> > Hi, Arnd,
> >
> > Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
> >
>
> Hi Alison,
>
> I'm sorry but I understand very little of this particular area of the kernel.
>
> I've added
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> > Hi, Arnd,
> >
> > Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
> >
>
> Hi Alison,
>
> I'm sorry but I understand very little of this particular area of the kernel.
>
> I've added
On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> Hi, Arnd,
>
> Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
>
Hi Alison,
I'm sorry but I understand very little of this particular area of the kernel.
I've added Daniel Lezcano, John Stultz and Thomas Gleixner to Cc, they
On Monday 28 December 2015 07:18:58 Huan Wang wrote:
> Hi, Arnd,
>
> Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
>
Hi Alison,
I'm sorry but I understand very little of this particular area of the kernel.
I've added Daniel Lezcano, John Stultz and Thomas Gleixner to Cc, they
Hi, Arnd,
Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> > Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be registered
> > as the tick broadcast device in the absence of a real
Hi, Arnd,
Could you help to review the following patch? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> > Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be registered
> > as the tick broadcast device in the absence of a real
Hi,
Could you help to review this patch?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> > Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be registered
> > as the tick broadcast device in the absence of a real
Hi,
Could you help to review this patch?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> > Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be registered
> > as the tick broadcast device in the absence of a real
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be
> registered as the tick broadcast device in the absence of
> a real external clock device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
This looks sensible to me. FWIW:
Acked-by: Mark
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> Hrtimer based broadcast is used on ARM platform. It can be
> registered as the tick broadcast device in the absence of
> a real external clock device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
This looks sensible to
Hi, Mark,
Could you comment this patch? It is based on your suggestion in
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6764231/ .
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> -Original Message-
> From: Alison Wang [mailto:b18...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:12 PM
> To:
Hi, Mark,
Could you comment this patch? It is based on your suggestion in
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6764231/ .
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> -Original Message-
> From: Alison Wang [mailto:b18...@freescale.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:12 PM
> To:
19 matches
Mail list logo