On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:54:55 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
> %pK was at least once misused at %pk in an out-of-tree module.
> This lead to some security concerns. Add the ability to track
> single and multiple line statements for misuses of %p.
Should we also do this?
---
a/lib/vsprintf.c~checkpat
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 16:11 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:54:55 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > %pK was at least once misused at %pk in an out-of-tree module.
> > > This lead to some security concerns. Add the abi
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 16:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:54:55 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > %pK was at least once misused at %pk in an out-of-tree module.
> > This lead to some security concerns. Add the ability to track
> > single and multiple line statements for misus
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:54:55 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> %pK was at least once misused at %pk in an out-of-tree module.
>> This lead to some security concerns. Add the ability to track
>> single and multiple line statements for misuses of
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:j...@perches.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 12:55 PM
> To: Andrew Morton ; Andy Whitcroft
>
> Cc: Roberts, William C ; kernel-
> harden...@lists.openwall.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add ability
5 matches
Mail list logo
