From: Arnd Bergmann
> Sent: 05 May 2020 16:00
...
> Yes, we usually backport trivial warning fixes to stable kernels to allow
> building those with any modern compiler version.
In this case wouldn't it be better to backport a change that disables
the specific compiler warning?
David
-
Re
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:24 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Linus, let me know if you would like me to Cc you on the other gcc-10
> warning fixes I have and possibly apply some directly.
Sure. If you have any of the "trivially correct, and doesn't make code
look worse", push them my way.
I only did
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:07 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
> On 5/5/20 10:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:35 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> > wrote:
> >> On 5/5/20 09:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> I wonder why would we need to backport these changes to -stable... merely
> >> becaus
On 5/5/20 10:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:35 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> wrote:
>> On 5/5/20 09:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> gcc-10 warns about accesses into the f_handle[] zero-length array.
>>>
>>> fs/notify/fdinfo.c: In function 'show_mark_fhandle':
>>> fs/notify/fdinfo.c
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:35 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
> On 5/5/20 09:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > gcc-10 warns about accesses into the f_handle[] zero-length array.
> >
> > fs/notify/fdinfo.c: In function 'show_mark_fhandle':
> > fs/notify/fdinfo.c:66:47: error: array subscript 'i' is outside
On 5/5/20 09:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-10 warns about accesses into the f_handle[] zero-length array.
>
> fs/notify/fdinfo.c: In function 'show_mark_fhandle':
> fs/notify/fdinfo.c:66:47: error: array subscript 'i' is outside the bounds of
> an interior zero-length array 'unsigned char[0]'
6 matches
Mail list logo
