Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: correct the method of getting private data in notifier_call

Hey Dong Aisheng, > Besides above comments: > > Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng Are you maybe interested in maintaining this driver? We are seriously needing one with experience. Thanks, Wolfram signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: correct the method of getting private data in notifier_call

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:59:34AM +, Anson Huang wrote: > The way of getting private imx_i2c_struct in i2c_imx_clk_notifier_call() > is incorrect, should use clk_change_nb element to get correct address > and avoid below kernel dump during POST_RATE_CHANGE notify by clk > framework: > > Unabl

RE: [PATCH] i2c: imx: correct the method of getting private data in notifier_call

.com; u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de; > e...@deif.com; li...@rempel-privat.de; mo...@codeaurora.org; Laurentiu > Tudor ; p...@axentia.se; linux- > i...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: dl-linux-imx > Subject: RE: [PATCH] i2c

RE: [PATCH] i2c: imx: correct the method of getting private data in notifier_call

[...] > > > > Fixes: 90ad2cbe88c2("i2c: imx: use clk notifier for rate changes") > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang > > Please also provide how to reproduce it. > And it seems not a new issue, should we CC stable? Besides above comments: Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng Regards Dong Aisheng > > Regar

RE: [PATCH] i2c: imx: correct the method of getting private data in notifier_call

> From: Anson Huang > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:00 AM > > The way of getting private imx_i2c_struct in i2c_imx_clk_notifier_call() is > incorrect, should use clk_change_nb element to get correct address and avoid > below kernel dump during POST_RATE_CHANGE notify by clk > framework: > >