On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:19:58 -0500 Dan Streetman wrote:
>
>> >>> > Acutally, I really don't know how much benefit we have that in-memory
>> >>> > swap overcomming to the real storage but if you want, zRAM with
>> >>> > dm-cache
>> >>> > is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:33:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:19:58 -0500 Dan Streetman wrote:
>>
>> > >>> > Acutally, I really don't know how much benefit we have that in-memory
>> > >>> > swap overco
On 2014-01-22 19:18, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> From the beginning, zswap is for reducing swap I/O but if workingset
> overflows, it should write back rather than OOM with expecting a small
> number of writeback would make the system happy because the high memory
> pressure is temporal so soon most of
On 01/23/2014 08:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:33:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:19:58 -0500 Dan Streetman wrote:
>>
>>> Acutally, I really don't know how much benefit we have that in-memory
>>> swap overcomming to the r
Hello all,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:33:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:19:58 -0500 Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> > >>> > Acutally, I really don't know how much benefit we have that in-memory
> > >>> > swap overcomming to the real storage but if you want, zRAM with
> > >>>
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:19:58 -0500 Dan Streetman wrote:
> >>> > Acutally, I really don't know how much benefit we have that in-memory
> >>> > swap overcomming to the real storage but if you want, zRAM with dm-cache
> >>> > is another option rather than invent new wheel by "just having is
> >>> >
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:10:44AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> > Hello Dan,
>>> >
>>> > Sorry for the late res
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:10:44AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > Hello Dan,
>> >
>> > Sorry for the late response and I didn't look at the code yet
>> > because I am not con
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:10:44AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hello Dan,
> >
> > Sorry for the late response and I didn't look at the code yet
> > because I am not convinced. :(
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:23:27AM -0500, Dan
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> Sorry for the late response and I didn't look at the code yet
> because I am not convinced. :(
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:23:27AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> Currently, zswap is writeback cache; stored pages are not sent
>
Hello Dan,
Sorry for the late response and I didn't look at the code yet
because I am not convinced. :(
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:23:27AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Currently, zswap is writeback cache; stored pages are not sent
> to swap disk, and when zswap wants to evict old pages it must
Ping to see if this patch can get picked up.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:23:27AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> Currently, zswap is writeback cache; stored pages are not sent
>> to swap disk, and when zswap wants to evict old pages it must
>>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:23:27AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Currently, zswap is writeback cache; stored pages are not sent
> to swap disk, and when zswap wants to evict old pages it must
> first write them back to swap cache/disk manually. This avoids
> swap out disk I/O up front, but only mo
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Happy new year!
>
> Seth, just checking if you have had a chance yet to think about this one.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > Currently, zswap is writeback cache; stored pages are not sent
> > to swap disk, an
Happy new year!
Seth, just checking if you have had a chance yet to think about this one.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Currently, zswap is writeback cache; stored pages are not sent
> to swap disk, and when zswap wants to evict old pages it must
> first write them ba
15 matches
Mail list logo
