On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:39:43PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Siddha, Suresh B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Further now that we cache the msi message that read_msi_msg should go
> away and we should use the cached version from the msi_desc.
Ok. Then this patch is a must.
> > Don't
"Siddha, Suresh B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> set_msi_irq_affinity() is already doing read_msi_msg(). So the mask operation
> before this should atleast get flushed before we modify the irq destination
> information.
We modify irq reception information in assign_irq_vector, before that.
With
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:41:49AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> When we mask or unmask a msi-x irqs the writes may be posted because
> we are writing to memory mapped region. This means the mask and
> unmask don't happen immediately but at some unspecified time in the
> future. Which is out
Acked-by: Mitch Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>This is a simplified and actually more comprehensive form of a bug
>fix from Mitch Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
[snip]
>Then if people do have a kernel message stating "No irq for vector" we
>will know it is yet another novel cause that needs a
Acked-by: Mitch Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a simplified and actually more comprehensive form of a bug
fix from Mitch Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED].
[snip]
Then if people do have a kernel message stating No irq for vector we
will know it is yet another novel cause that needs a complete new
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:41:49AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
When we mask or unmask a msi-x irqs the writes may be posted because
we are writing to memory mapped region. This means the mask and
unmask don't happen immediately but at some unspecified time in the
future. Which is out of
Siddha, Suresh B [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
set_msi_irq_affinity() is already doing read_msi_msg(). So the mask operation
before this should atleast get flushed before we modify the irq destination
information.
We modify irq reception information in assign_irq_vector, before that.
With my
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:39:43PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Siddha, Suresh B [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Further now that we cache the msi message that read_msi_msg should go
away and we should use the cached version from the msi_desc.
Ok. Then this patch is a must.
Don't we need the
8 matches
Mail list logo