Thanks !
-Original Message-
From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:09 AM
To: Sharma, Sanjeev
Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; steve.glendinn...@shawell.net;
net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smsc: replace
From: Sanjeev Sharma
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:46:23 +0530
> spin_is_locked() always return false in uniprocessor configuration and
> therefore it
> would be advise to repalce with WARN_ON_SMP().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma
This looks fine, applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this l
: Re: [PATCH] smsc: replace WARN_ON() with WARN_ON_SMP()
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:46:23PM +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> spin_is_locked() always return false in uniprocessor configuration and
> therefore it would be advise to repalce with WARN_ON_SMP().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sa
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:46:23PM +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> spin_is_locked() always return false in uniprocessor configuration and
> therefore it
> would be advise to repalce with WARN_ON_SMP().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc911x.h | 2 +-
> 1 fil
4 matches
Mail list logo