On Thursday 14 April 2016 04:25 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
From: Sudip Mukherjee
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 12:05 AM
The return type of usbhsp_setup_pipecfg() was u16 but it was returning
a negative value (-EINVAL). Instead
On Thursday 14 April 2016 04:25 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
From: Sudip Mukherjee
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 12:05 AM
The return type of usbhsp_setup_pipecfg() was u16 but it was returning
a negative value (-EINVAL). Instead lets return a pointer to u16 which
Hi,
Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
>> From: Sudip Mukherjee
>> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 12:05 AM
>>
>> The return type of usbhsp_setup_pipecfg() was u16 but it was returning
>> a negative value (-EINVAL). Instead lets return a pointer to u16 which
>> will
Hi,
Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
>> From: Sudip Mukherjee
>> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 12:05 AM
>>
>> The return type of usbhsp_setup_pipecfg() was u16 but it was returning
>> a negative value (-EINVAL). Instead lets return a pointer to u16 which
>> will hold the value to be returned or in
Hi,
> From: Sudip Mukherjee
> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 12:05 AM
>
> The return type of usbhsp_setup_pipecfg() was u16 but it was returning
> a negative value (-EINVAL). Instead lets return a pointer to u16 which
> will hold the value to be returned or in case of error, return the
> error
Hi,
> From: Sudip Mukherjee
> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 12:05 AM
>
> The return type of usbhsp_setup_pipecfg() was u16 but it was returning
> a negative value (-EINVAL). Instead lets return a pointer to u16 which
> will hold the value to be returned or in case of error, return the
> error
6 matches
Mail list logo