On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:07:14PM +0100, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> Hi Sreekanth,
>
> I think this should be handled as any other change with an usual
> patch sent to the list, 'git revert 3520f9c779' and 'git revert 963ba22b90'
> will create the patches for you.
Exactly. And now I'll need a review f
Ok. Thanks Tomas, I will follow the same and will send the revert
patch to Upstream.
Thanks,
Sreekanth.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> Hi Sreekanth,
>
> I think this should be handled as any other change with an usual
> patch sent to the list, 'git revert 3520f9c779' and 'g
Hi Sreekanth,
I think this should be handled as any other change with an usual
patch sent to the list, 'git revert 3520f9c779' and 'git revert 963ba22b90'
will create the patches for you.
Cheers,
Tomas
On 12/02/2014 02:18 PM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> Hi James/Chris
>
> We are observing below iss
Hi James/Chris
We are observing below issue due to this patch set code changes
Issue Description:
Drives connected Enclosure/Expander won't be visible to the OS if any
one remove and add expander cable with in DMD (Device Missing Delay) time
period (also if any power-off and power-on the Enc
Hi James,
This patch set seem to be fine. Please consider this patch set.
Regards,
Sreekanth
>-Original Message-
>From: Jan Vesely [mailto:jves...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:31 PM
>To: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: Jan Vesely; Nandigama
5 matches
Mail list logo