On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:47:58PM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 11:22 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> This patchset promotes zram/zsm
On 08/13/2012 11:22 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
>>> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embe
> > On a second thought, I think zsmalloc should stay in drivers/block/zram
> > since zram is now the only user of zsmalloc since zcache and ramster are
> > moving to another allocator.
>
> The removal of zsmalloc from zcache has not been agreed upon
> yet.
>
> Dan _suggested_ removing zsmalloc a
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:39:25PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 12:36 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> > On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> >>> Both are
On 08/14/2012 12:36 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
>>> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
>>> for a long time
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:22:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> > > Both are very clean and zr
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> > Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> > for a long time.
> >
> > [1-3] a
Hi Nitin,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:36:47PM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> >> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embe
On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
>> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
>> for a long time.
>>
>> [1-3] are patches not merged into linux-n
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> for a long time.
>
> [1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet but needed
> it as base for [4-5] which promotes
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:35:37AM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 11:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> > Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> > for a long time.
> >
> > [1-3] are patches not merged into linux-ne
On 08/07/2012 11:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> for a long time.
>
> [1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet but needed
> it as base for [4-5] which promotes zsmalloc.
> Greg,
12 matches
Mail list logo
