On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> Which brings us back to the original question (and raises another one) - can
> we assume yet that
> 'wmt' will be the vendor-binding for Wondermedia? Also, what are we going to
> use for VIA-based
> SoC's given that VIA is the ticker for VIACOM.
>
>
...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to
docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> I have no issue with that.
>
> I am mainly concerned with the Wondermedia products at the moment.
>
> Adding device tree support
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> I have no issue with that.
>
> I am mainly concerned with the Wondermedia products at the moment.
>
> Adding device tree support for WM8505 (and WM8650) is my main goal as the
> WM8650
> currently isn't supported and trying to get another board file
gt; King; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to
> docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt
>
> On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
>> Given that there have been no replies to this thre
s.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to
> docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt
>
> On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
>> Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch
>> has
>> now been accepte
Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to
docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch
> has
> now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to
> assu
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch
> has
> now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to
> assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt?
>
> I'd like to try and have
Alexey
> Charkov
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2012 1:31 a.m.
> To: vt8500-wm8505-linux-ker...@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Tony Prisk; devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; Russell King;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedi
2012/7/17 Arnd Bergmann :
> It would also be helpful to describe why the specific string is used here.
> Normally we use the stock ticker symbol and "wmt" refers to Wal-Mart,
> which would be unlikely but not impossible to produce their own hardware
> in the future. The same thing applies to "via",
On Tuesday 17 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> From 756ae5c2f475d679649adff99058679b651af8d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tony Prisk
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:09:31 +1200
> Subject: [PATCH] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to vendor-prefixes.txt
> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk
Something went
10 matches
Mail list logo
