; jasow...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Include the limit on the number
> of pfns we can handle
>
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:07:42AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Dan Carpente
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de; a...@canonical.com;
> > jasow...@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Include the limit on the number
> > of pfns we can handle
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:
; jasow...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Include the limit on the number
> of pfns we can handle
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:08PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > Increase the maximum number of pfns w
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:08PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> Increase the maximum number of pfns we can handle is a single vmbus packet.
^^ in
>
What are the user visible effects of this patch?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe f
bject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Include the limit on the number
> of pfns we can handle
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:08PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > Increase the maximum number of pfns we can handle is a single vmbus
> packet.
>
> Is that a correct
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:15:08PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> Increase the maximum number of pfns we can handle is a single vmbus packet.
Is that a correct sentance?
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
> ---
> include/linux/hyperv.h |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 delet
6 matches
Mail list logo
