On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote:
> This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley
Applied to for-current, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote:
This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC.
Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com
Applied to for-current, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:08:35AM +, Heasley, Seth wrote:
> >> The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released,
> >whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced.
> >>
> >Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we
> >can just wait
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:08:35AM +, Heasley, Seth wrote:
The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released,
whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced.
Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we
can just wait for it?
I
>> The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released,
>whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced.
>>
>Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we
>can just wait for it?
I don't, and actually couldn't tell you if I did. The codename
The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released,
whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced.
Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we
can just wait for it?
I don't, and actually couldn't tell you if I did. The codename usage
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:19:48PM +, Heasley, Seth wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> >> This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton
> >SOC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley
> >Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than
> >the project
Hi Neil,
>> This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton
>SOC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley
>Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than
>the project code name? That would seem to be more in keeping with the
>previous naming
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote:
> This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley
Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than the
project code name? That would seem to be
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote:
This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC.
Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com
Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than the
project code name?
Hi Neil,
This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton
SOC.
Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com
Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than
the project code name? That would seem to be more in keeping with the
previous
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:19:48PM +, Heasley, Seth wrote:
Hi Neil,
This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton
SOC.
Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com
Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than
the
12 matches
Mail list logo