Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-03-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote: > This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC. > > Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley Applied to for-current, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-03-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote: This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC. Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com Applied to for-current, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-26 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:08:35AM +, Heasley, Seth wrote: > >> The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released, > >whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced. > >> > >Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we > >can just wait

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-26 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:08:35AM +, Heasley, Seth wrote: The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released, whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced. Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we can just wait for it? I

RE: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-25 Thread Heasley, Seth
>> The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released, >whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced. >> >Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we >can just wait for it? I don't, and actually couldn't tell you if I did. The codename

RE: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-25 Thread Heasley, Seth
The difference here is that the S1200 name is already publicly released, whereas the naming for Avoton hasn't been announced. Do you know when the announcement will be? Is it sufficiently soon that we can just wait for it? I don't, and actually couldn't tell you if I did. The codename usage

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-21 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:19:48PM +, Heasley, Seth wrote: > Hi Neil, > > >> This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton > >SOC. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley > >Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than > >the project

RE: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-21 Thread Heasley, Seth
Hi Neil, >> This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton >SOC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley >Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than >the project code name? That would seem to be more in keeping with the >previous naming

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-21 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote: > This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC. > > Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than the project code name? That would seem to be

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-21 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:30:43PM -0800, Seth Heasley wrote: This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC. Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than the project code name?

RE: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-21 Thread Heasley, Seth
Hi Neil, This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC. Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than the project code name? That would seem to be more in keeping with the previous

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: iSMT SMBus patch for Intel Avoton DeviceIDs

2013-02-21 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:19:48PM +, Heasley, Seth wrote: Hi Neil, This patch adds the iSMT SMBus Controller DeviceIDs for the Intel Avoton SOC. Signed-off-by: Seth Heasley seth.heas...@intel.com Is there a part number (I.e. S1200) that we can use in the name, rather than the