>
>
> Hmm, would it not be nicer to simply reject the write instead of silently
> ignoring it?
>
Yes, I agree.
Thanks,
Kan
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index
>
>
>
> Hmm, would it not be nicer to simply reject the write instead of silently
> ignoring it?
>
Yes, I agree.
Thanks,
Kan
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index
>
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:26:06AM -0700, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> This patch fixes an issue which was introduced from 'commit 91a612eea9a3
> ("perf/core: Fix dynamic interrupt throttle")'
> The old patch unconditionally sets the
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:26:06AM -0700, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> This patch fixes an issue which was introduced from 'commit 91a612eea9a3
> ("perf/core: Fix dynamic interrupt throttle")'
> The old patch unconditionally sets the perf_sample_allowed_ns value to
> !0. But
4 matches
Mail list logo