Hi, Benjiamin
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:13 AM
> To: Rafael J . Wysocki ; Zheng, Lv
> Cc: Jiri Eischmann ; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Remove lid_
Hi, Benjamin
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Zheng,
> Lv
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method
> mode"
>
> Hi, Benjiamin
>
> > From: Be
On May 11 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Benjamin
>
> > From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Zheng,
> > Lv
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Remove
> > lid_init_
Hi,
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin
> Tissoires
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method
> mode"
>
> On May 11 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
On May 12 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin
> > Tissoires
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Remove
> > lid_i
reference so that we can figure out an agreement
between us.
Though I don't know if end users will buy it (they may keep on filing
regression reports in ACPI community).
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ACPI / butto
nity).
Switching back to button.lid_init_state=method will prevent regressions
to be filled. If a user buys a new machine and the LID switch doesn't
work as expected, it's not a regression, it's a bug. Regression is
something we absolutely need to avoid, and switching to
button.lid_init_
Hi, Benjamin
I reordered the discussion to collect topics and delete things to make
discussion shorter.
1. root caused issue:
> > It seems we just need to determine the following first:
> > 1. Who should be responsible for solving bugs triggered by the conflict
> > between bios and linux user
8 matches
Mail list logo